User talk:Leoboudv
Add topic|
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
| |
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
Hi, Leoboudv. I think you may have made a mistake at Oedignathus inermis.jpg (the same one I was about to make for another image). Going to the source and hovering over that image, the plaintext license reads "CreativeCommons - Attribution No Derivatives (2017)". I think the CC logo missing "ND" is an oversight on their part, but the text clearly states "No Derivatives". Not sure what to do about this, but assuming in your judgment we cannot use it, I can go about replacing it sitewide before it's deleted, as we have other decent images of O. inermis. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 17:10, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dear User:TheTechnician27,
The License Holder of the image is stated to be by "Gustav Paulay, Florida Museum of Natural History" and this image license is CC BY 3.0 Generic. It is not a mistake. This license is a free license at the source and the license here is CC BY 3.0 Only Gustav Paulay's two images at the source are free, the rest have a NC restriction. If you wish to replace the use of the image, that is your decision, not mine. This image will not be deleted. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:28, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Leo, as noted, I believe that graphic with the link to CC BY 3.0 Unported may be an oversight on their part, as they clearly label in plaintext that it is "CreativeCommons - Attribution No Derivatives". What you choose to do with these contradicting licenses is up to you, but I'm just making you aware that this doesn't appear cut-and-dry. With that, I'll get back to working on other stuff. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 21:35, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dear User:TheTechnician27,
When it comes to images, people may chose to license some of their images freely and others not freely as another uploader once mentioned to me. All I know is that this image comes from the Third image at the source and is CC BY 3.0. I do that too sometimes on my flickr account. Everyone is different. My computer is Canada clearly says it is CC BY 3.0 Generic for the Third image in the source. The License holder is "Gustav Paulay, Florida Museum of Natural History"...and the uploader did not make a mistake here. PS: There are also free images at Inaturalist as this image shows: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tubuca_urvillei.jpg along with an Inaturalist bot review over here which marks images almost daily. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:43, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dear User:TheTechnician27,
- If you have a better image and wish to replace it's use on wikipedia please go ahead, but the uploaded image is indeed free. PS: The only source that counts is this source where a whole bunch of other people gave licenses for their images. The BOLD website is used by people to upload hundreds of images of nature every years. As in 3456 images Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
WV23 images
[edit]Hello, I saw that you uploaded File:Painted Hieroglyphs in the Tomb of Ay.jpg and File:Burial chamber and Sarcophagus of Ay in WV23.jpg from a flickr user in April 2025. Can you also upload https://www.flickr.com/photos/travelourplanet/52625229850/in/photostream/ from the same flickr user as that image contains the only figure of pharaoh Ay from the tomb that escaped erasure? Thank you. 72.128.66.229 23:20, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
Done: The image is here: File:Painted relief from Ay's WV23 tomb.jpg
- By the way, if you are interested, I created and sourced ALL the images for this interesting wikipedia article in early 2025: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dush,_Egypt
Finally, these are two sets of images that people on flickr agreed to license freely for Commons (2024 to 2025) including a sceptre of Tutankhamun: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AMediaSearch&search=merja+attia&fulltext=Search&type=image AND
this other set of images long ago from 2008 to 2014: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AMediaSearch&search=tutincommon+flickr&fulltext=Search&type=image
Today, I am less active on Egyptology as I have less time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:35, 16 July 2025 (UTC)
My Commons upload records
[edit]Dear Michael,
Do you know a way to show the number of images that I have actually uploaded to Commons rather my number of contributions--which includes images that I reviewed or simple edits to correct typos/errors to image descriptions which is not really pertinent in my request. Unfortunately it is early morning in Canada and I have to go to bed. If you know a way to check for my image uploads, please feel free to do so. If not...then it is what it is, I suppose. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 12:34, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I guess we need to make a query where you are either the only uploader or where you uploaded the original file. I do not know of a tool we can use. --MGA73 (talk) 20:17, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi! I tried to find the number for you:
- https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/95740 425 files
- https://quarry.wmcloud.org/query/95739 4,000 files
Post here for my records. Total 4425 uploaded files. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
A new noticeboard for permission requests from external sources
[edit]
Dear License reviewer,This is to inform you that a new page, Commons:Permission requests, has been created to centralize and manage requests for permission to external sources. The page is intended to help streamline the review process by providing a dedicated space where users can submit and track their permission requests.You may wish to visit the page to familiarize yourself with its purpose and format, and to monitor any new submissions that may require your attention. By default, license reviewers may process requests on the page. Any questions may be directed at Commons talk:Permission requests.Thank you for your continued work in ensuring proper license compliance across Commons.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
Undelete request
[edit]Hello Leoboudv, could you plz resolve this undelete request here..? I had licensed it properly and you had reviewed it.. --Gpkp (talk) 05:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Dear Gpkp,
From the comments in the Deletion Request, it appears that the image or video was previously used by other users and no one knows who was the original copyright owner. I reviewed it based on the free license....but I cannot restore an image or video since I am a trusted reviewer who only verifies image or video licenses, not an Admin. I would say that this file cannot be restored when Admin Jim says that it is a copyright violation. I trust Admin Jim the most on copyright and have asked his help on other copyright issues. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:42, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Save this Links for Flickr
[edit]Type https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_(treasurer) AS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_%28treasurer%29
OR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amenemope_(pharaoh) AS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amenemope_%28pharaoh%29
Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
File:Prime Minister Imran Khan Adresses the Forum 01.jpg
[edit]Dear Sir,
please review this file. --2406:7400:107:AC59:0:0:0:1 05:07, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Done --Leoboudv (talk) 06:15, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
Information on temporary account IP viewer rights
[edit]Hello Leoboudv,
On November 12, temporary accounts will be enabled on Commons. The IP of unregistered users will then be hidden for most users. You, as a patroller or license reviewer, are eligible to request the new temporary account IP viewer right, if you need it to continue fighting vandalism and abuse on Commons. If you want to request the right, please file the request here. Please be aware that you also have to accept the Wikimedia Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy in your preferences. For more information about temporary accounts, look at the project page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Review request 11 December 2025
[edit]Hello, could you review File:Jorge Azcón at the 168th Plenary Session of the European Committee of the Regions.jpg? Basque mapping (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Done --Leoboudv (talk) 03:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
Email notification
[edit]I sent you an email via en.wp because you repeatedly posted misinform me there. Please retract it and desist. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:42, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- Dear User:Koavf,
You were banned on English wikipedia as I noted. I was mistaken for the reason why. It was for disruptive editing and not for creating multiple accounts. I am sorry for this error--and have corrected my mistake here on your wikipedia talkpage--but you were indefinitely banned for disruptive editing and I did not even know this and was not involved with this decision at all. I cannot retract what happened to you on English wikipedia because it is factual information and not a lie. You were reportedly harassing other contributors on English wikipedia. If you harass me on Commons, it would show that you have not changed your behaviour--at all. I would prefer that you don't do this---and contribute to the Wikimedia Common's project.
As you state on your userpage: "If you did not see the editnotice for this page, please note that I am sitebanned on the English Wikipedia." If you think this decision was a mistake or wish to appeal your permanent suspension, please contact Admin User:Floquenbeam who banned you. I have been editing less on wikipedia due to my health and just concentrate on a few topics. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
- I did not expect you to retract what happened, nor did I call it a lie. Thank you for your prompt response. I hope that your help improves in 2026. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:09, 14 December 2025 (UTC)
Image Review
[edit]Hey, I see you did a license review on one of photos: File:Union TTC Subway station (2025-01-05) 03.jpg. I noticed you removed the existing CC-BY-SA 2.0 license, could you please restore that? Although I upgraded the license to 4.0 on Flickr, the 2.0 license is irrevocable, so it should be multi-licensed with both. Thanks. PascalHD (talk) 04:10, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Done: as per your request PascalHD Some uploaders prefer a more "modern" CC BY SA 4.0 version of their license. But your request is done. Thanks for your heads up. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:14, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- I should have clarified - I would like both licenses there. CC 4.0 and 2.0. Thanks. I can't undo the edits. PascalHD (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Done here: File:Union TTC Subway station (2025-01-05) 03.jpg PascalHD Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:42, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks! PascalHD (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Wrestling pictures
[edit]Hi, I see you have tagged some photos I have uploaded from a wrestling show. I'm not familiar with how camera metadata works, but it seems to me that it's unlikely that someone else than the pro hotographer Zeke Dane had taken and uploaded them. He's been a photographer of pro wrestling for some years now and I'm fairly certain that that is indeed his Flickr account. Does the metadata imply that he has stolen these images somehow? StarTrekker (talk) 01:16, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Dear StarTrekker The camera metadata clearly says the Author is "Fred Brigss" with the statement "COPYRIGHT 2000&2001 FRED BRIGGS,ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." If this was Fred Briggs flickr account, then the image could be own work...but this is not so. Therefore, it appears likely that Zeke Daniel 'took' Fredd Briggs' images and posted it on his flickr account. It happens all the time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:34, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Couldn't that also just be explained by Dane borrowing someone elses camera? It seems unlikely to me that someone who works professionally as a wrestling photographer would steal and take credit for someone elses photo on their own account when they clearly take photos themselves all the time.StarTrekker (talk) 01:37, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Maybe or maybe not...but I cannot review images where the camera metadata clearly names a different photographer with an All Rights Reserved license statement to boot StarTrekker. Maybe you should contact an Admin for clarification here...as I just review images. Thanks, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- Good idea, I made a request for help at the administrators' noticeboard.StarTrekker (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Review request
[edit]Hello Leoboudv, request you to review these files:
- File:10 useful Ayurvedic medicines to replace Allopathic drugs- dr.dalal's Ayurveda-.webm
- File:Ayurveda, Allopathy & the Best System of Medicine.webm
- File:Ayurvedic Treatment for Diabetes - Swami Ramdev.webm
- File:Ayurvedic Treatment for Migraine - Swami Ramdev.webm
- File:Ayurvedic Treatment for Prostate - Swami Ramdev.webm
- File:Ayurvedic Treatment for Tonsil - Swami Ramdev.webm
- File:Ayurvedic Treatment of Physical Weakness - Swami Ramdev.webm
- File:Live-100-दुबला पतला शरीर का असली कारण - Weak Body Ayurveda Q&A Live with Dr Arun -mishraveda.webm
- File:Top Ayurvedic Recipes to Help You Heal Your Body - Divya's Kitchen -- Food Curated.webm
--Gpkp (talk) 10:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Done --Leoboudv (talk) 12:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you Leoboudv. --Gpkp (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Check license
[edit]Hi, friend. I have uploaded the new photos of Category:Lamoon, that's File:LAMOON - THE TUNNEL HCMC PREMIERE.jpg and its cropped version. Can you please check the license of these photos?
And beside, can you also check my new uploaded photos in Category:Han Sara and Category:Kiên Ứng, please?
Thank you so much and see you next time. Mickey Đại Phát (talk) 09:14, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Done: Original size images were reviewed by me or other reviewers. --Leoboudv (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Check license
[edit]Hi, friend. I have uploaded the new photos of Category:Optical_seekers that's File And File [[:File:Ve pka ak103 Mira colimadora punto rojo Belomo PK-AA.jpg]] Both files already have source and license; approval is needed. Please check.
Can you please check the license of these photos?
@Leoboudv Walm Hert (talk) 11:02, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
Done: Files deleted per flickrwashing. --Achim55 (talk) 13:04, 21 January 2026 (UTC)